Showing posts with label guest blogger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label guest blogger. Show all posts

Thursday, October 13, 2016

History meets Fiction with Andrew Joyce

32285027My name is Andrew Joyce and I write books for a living. Tracy has been kind enough to allow me a little space on her blog to talk about my latest, Yellow Hair.
Yellow Hair documents the injustices done to the Sioux Nation from their first treaty with the United States in 1805 through Wounded Knee in 1890. Every death, murder, battle, and outrage depicted actually took place—from the first to the last. The historical figures that play a role in my story were real people and I used their real names. I conjured up my protagonist only to weave together the various events conveyed in my fact-based tale of fiction. Yellow Hair is an epic tale of adventure, family, love, and hate that spans most of the 19th century. It is American history.
The inspiration for the book came to me when I was reading a short article and it made reference to the Great Sioux Uprising of 1862. It also mentioned that the outcome involved the largest mass execution in the history of the United States. That piqued my interest.

When I started my research into the incident, one thing led to another and before I knew it, I was documenting the entire history of the Sioux, who are also known as the Dakota, vis-à-vis the relationship between them and the United States.

Because the book exists only because I read the phrase, “the largest mass execution in the history of the United States,” I’ll tell you a little about that. What follows is an extremely abbreviated version of events.

The Dakota signed their first treaty with the United States in 1805 when they sold a small portion of their land to the Americans for the purpose of building forts. It was right after the Louisiana Purchase and President Jefferson wanted a presence in the West. At the time, “the West” was anything on the western side of the Mississippi River.

In the treaty of 1805, the Dakota sold 100,000 acres to the Americans. The agreed-upon price was $2.00 per acre. But when the treaty came up before the Senate for ratification, the amount was changed to two cents per acre. That was to be a precursor for all future treaties with the Americans. There were subsequent treaties in 1815, 1825, 1832, 1837, and 1851, and basically the same thing happened with all those treaties.

In 1837, the Americans wanted an additional five million acres of Dakota land. Knowing it would be a hard sell after the way they failed to live up to the letter or spirit of the previous treaties, the government brought twenty-six Dakota chiefs to Washington to show them the might and majesty that was The United States of America.

The government proposed paying one million dollars for the acreage in installments over a twenty-year period. Part of the payment was to be in the form of farm equipment, medicine, and livestock. Intimidated, the Indians signed the treaty and went home. The United States immediately laid claim to the lands—the first payment did not arrive for a year.

The significance of the 1837 treaty lies in the fact that it was the first time “traders” were allowed to lay claim to the Indians’ payments without any proof that money was owed . . . and without consulting the Indians. Monies were subtracted from the imbursements and paid directly to the traders.

By 1851, the Americans wanted to purchase all of the Dakota’s remaining lands—twenty-five million acres. The Sioux did not want to sell, but were forced to do so with threats that the army could be sent in to take the land from them at the point of a gun if they refused the American’s offer.

“If we sell our land, where will we live?” asked the Dakota chief.

“We will set aside land for the Dakota only. It is called a reservation and it will be along both banks of the Minnesota River, twenty miles wide, ten on each side and seventy miles long,” answered the Commissioner of Indian Affairs.

The Dakota were offered six cents an acre for land that was worth at least a dollar an acre. The payment would be stretched out over a twenty year period and was to be made in the form of gold coins. One year later, in 1852, the Americans took half the reservation, the seventy miles on the north side of the river. The Dakota were now reduced from a nation of fierce, independent people to a people dependent on hand-outs from the ones who stole not only their land, but also their dignity.

The Dakota were forced to buy their food from the traders who ran trading posts at the Indian Agency the U.S. Government had set up on the reservation. All year long the Dakota would charge what they needed. When the yearly payment for their land arrived, the traders would take what they said was owed them. Subsequently, there was very little gold left for the Dakota.

By 1862, the Dakota were starving. That year’s payment was months late in arriving because of the Civil War. The traders were afraid that because of the war there would be no payment that year and cut off the Dakota’s credit. The Indian Agent had the power to force the traders to release some of the food stocks, but refused when asked to do so by the Dakota.

After they had eaten their ponies and dogs, and their babies cried out in the night from hunger, the Dakota went to war against the United States of America.

They attacked the agency first and liberated the food stock from the warehouse, killing many white people who lived there. Then bands of braves set out to loot the farms in the surrounding countryside.

Many whites were killed in the ensuing weeks. However, not all of the Dakota went to war. Many stayed on the reservation and did not pick up arms against their white neighbors. Some saved the lives of white settlers. Still, over 700 hundred whites lost their lives before the rebellion was put down.

When the dust settled, all of the Dakota—including women and children, and those people who had saved settlers’ lives—were made prisoners of war.

Three hundred and ninety-six men were singled out to stand trial before a military commission. They were each tried separately in trials that lasted only minutes. In the end, three hundred and three men were sentenced to death.

Even though he was occupied with the war, President Lincoln got involved. He reviewed all three hundred and three cases and pardoned all but thirty-eight of the prisoners.

On a gray and overcast December morning in 1862, the scaffold stood high. Thirty-eight nooses hung from its crossbeams. The mechanism for springing the thirty-eight trap doors had been tested and retested until it worked perfectly. At exactly noon, a signal was given, a lever pulled, and the largest mass execution to ever take place in the United States of America became part of our history.

- Andrew Joyce

Author Biography

Andrew Joyce
Andrew Joyce left high school at seventeen to hitchhike throughout the US, Canada, and Mexico. He wouldn’t return from his journey until decades later when he decided to become a writer. Joyce has written five books, including a two-volume collection of one hundred and fifty short stories comprised of his hitching adventures called BEDTIME STORIES FOR GROWN-UPS (as yet unpublished), and his latest novel, YELLOW HAIR. He now lives aboard a boat in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, with his dog, Danny, where he is busy working on his next book, tentatively entitled,
MICK REILLY.

Purchase Yellow Hair on:

Monday, October 26, 2015

The Storyteller - Guest Review


One of my dearest friends wrote this review for The Coffee Pot and I am honored to share it with my fellow readers. Her words gave me chills. Hope you enjoy!


15753740Sage Singer befriends an old man who's particularly beloved in her community. Josef Weber is everyone's favorite retired teacher and Little League coach. They strike up a friendship at the bakery where Sage works. One day he asks Sage for a favor: to kill him. Shocked, Sage refuses... and then he confesses his darkest secret—he deserves to die, because he was a Nazi SS guard. Complicating the matter? Sage's grandmother is a Holocaust survivor.

What do you do when evil lives next door? Can someone who's committed a truly heinous act ever atone for it with subsequent good behavior? Should you offer forgiveness to someone if you aren't the party who was wronged? And most of all—if Sage even considers his request—is it murder, or justice?


*Contains Spoilers*

Very few books make me sob uncontrollably, laugh out loud, and question my own morals, all within a few hundred pages. Picoult writes a novel that cuts to the very core of humanity by forcing the reader to make an unimaginable choice.

“The Storyteller” by Jodi Picoult is about a girl named Sage Singer who is presented with an impossible decision. Sage is introverted to the extreme; she works a night shift as a baker, has very few friends, and spends as much time hiding herself from the world as she can. She blames herself for the death of her mother, and feels the rest of the world does too. She considers herself a lost cause, a loner. That is, until she meets a nice elderly man by the name of Josef who comes into her bakery, and later shows up at her support group. Josef is a beloved member of the community. He was a teacher at the local school, he coached football, and he is lovingly referred to as the town grandpa. Sage and Josef spend more and more time together, and she begins to open up to him about her loneliness and guilt. As they grow closer and closer, Josef tells Sage his darkest secret, and asks her for an unimaginable favor: he was a Nazi during World War II. He wants her to help him die, after she forgives him for his unforgivable actions. Sage’s family is Jewish, her grandmother is a holocaust survivor, and Josef feels she is as close as he can get to being forgiven for his sins.

Throughout the book, Sage struggles with the choice in front of her. Can she forgive him, when she was not a subject of his transgressions? Can she kill him for what he did? Would that be justice, or would it be giving him the easy way out? What would be the consequences (moral and otherwise) if she decides to grant him his wish? She calls in reinforcements at the Department of Justice, and begins gathering more information about him. This spurs a much needed love interest for Sage's character, which provides the only happy ending of the novel.

Josef begins telling his story about what it was like growing up in Germany, how it became an honor to learn how to be a good soldier and follow directions. Josef always felt second best; he was an average student whose brother excelled in school. But then he joined the SS Guard and quickly moved up the ranks. The overwhelming approval he received for being tough and following orders only fueled Josef's ego. His need to please his superiors quickly outweighed any morals he thought he had.  As he is ordered to do unspeakable things, he begins to drink away his actions. He knows what he is doing is wrong, but he feels he cannot stop. He stops thinking of Jews as people. He justifies what he is doing by telling himself he is only doing what he is told. Meanwhile, Picoult manages to keep the emotional attachment to Josef one of pity, even as he describes killing men, women, and children in cold blood. When Josef finishes telling his story, the reader is surprisingly not left with a feeling of hatred toward him. Instead, I almost felt… sorry for him. Sage, on the other hand, is appalled by what she hears.

To help make her choice, Sage approaches her grandmother, and then we begin to hear the other side of the story. Minka talks about growing up as a Jew in Poland, where she plays dress up with her best friend Darija and crushes on her teacher.  As the war progresses, she is forced to move to the ghetto where over a few years, most of her friends and family are killed or "deported", never to be heard from again. She is eventually sent on a train to Auschwitz, where she is forced to work and is nearly starved to death. Minka is a storyteller; she has been writing the same novel since she was a young teenager. The story changes as she gets older and experiences tragedies. In both a figurative and very literal sense, this novel she is writing is the reason Minka survives. By the end of her story, I was left in tears. Literally sobbing. The atrocities this woman endured are hard to imagine, yet Picoult writes them so that you experience every loss, every pain, and your heart breaks for this character.

Once Minka and Josef have both finished their stories, it is easy to figure out the stories are intertwined. Both the reader and Sage are now more conflicted than ever. Can Josef be forgiven for what he has done? The point is made that murder can never be forgiven, because the victim is not alive to grant forgiveness. Should Sage help him die? He is an elderly man, no longer a danger to anyone. He clearly feels guilt for his actions, as evidenced by his need to become a productive member of society. Can someone with a conscience murder thousands of innocent people? On the other hand, can someone without a conscience feel guilt and remorse?

As she struggles with the situation at hand, Sage receives advice from the few people close to her. She is told that forgiveness is not for the transgressor, it is for the person granting the forgiveness. In the end, Sage makes her choice.

What would you choose?

-Brooke, St. Louis

Sunday, March 11, 2012

The Lady Most Likely - Guest Blogger

I picked up The Lady Most Likely because, firstly, Julia Quinn (who is my personal favorite) is one of the authors involved and secondly because it seemed to hold amusing potential. This is the second book collaboration I've  completed and, although, I found the first one slightly repetitive I decided to give this one a shot.

Carolyn Finchley is hosting a house party just after the London season in an attempt to find a wife for her brother (upon his request). Thus a gathering of available men and women alike find themselves tossed together for games of hide-and-seek, hoping to discover their perfect match.  

The main characters of the bunch include: 
                   Hugh --  Carolyn’s horse loving brother 
                   Katherine -- out spoken and head strong
                   Neill -- the war-hero returned 
                   Gewndolyn -- the most desired of the season 
                   Alec -- dragged along to chaperone is sister Octavia 
                   Georgina -- the widow whom never plans to marry 

I personally thought that much fun and laughter was soon to commence, but instead found myself already confused by Chapter 5.  Chapter 4 begins from Gwen’s point of view, where on her morning walk she stumbles upon Alec, they have a pleasant conversation and he offers to escort her back to the house. 

Chapter 5 however is from Alec’s point of view where the conversation between them is quite different than that of the same conversation in chapter 4. After becoming rather "well acquainted," he sends Gwen back by herself to allow himself a dip in the cold pond.   

I found myself annoyed once again by a phrase that I read on page 149, “hell bent babe.” I feel this term wouldn't have been used in this time period and I found it quite out of place in this book. 

Other than those painfully irksome parts in the novel I continued and finished without much satisfaction. It was rather mediocre and I’ve found that with these three part novels you don’t really have time to attach yourselves to the characters. There was one particular pairing that I would have enjoyed an entire book about instead of only a third. I did find myself smiling at some parts and a few parts were quite amusing though.

-Caira


                               on Amazon
                     
                            rating: 3/5 cups